Medically Unlikely Edits (MUE) in Medical Billing: Unit Limits, MAI 1, 2 and 3, and What to Do

Medical billing terms· Reviewed October 2026

Medically unlikely edits (MUEs) are the unit-of-service limits CMS sets for HCPCS and CPT codes: the maximum number of units a single provider would report for a single patient on a single date of service on the vast majority of correctly coded claims. Exceed the value and the Medicare contractor denies the units.

MUEs are better documented now than when the first version of this article appeared in 2013, and most of what follows is in CMS’s own tables.

Where you see it

Place What you find
CMS MUE tables Three quarterly files: practitioner services, facility outpatient hospital services, and DME supplier services. Each row has the code, the MUE value, the MUE Adjudication Indicator (MAI) and the rationale
CMS-1500 box 24G, 837P SV104 The units of service on each line, which is what the edit tests
Remittance advice Typically CARC 151 (the information submitted does not support this many or this frequency of services) with RARC N362 (the number of days or units exceeds our acceptable maximum); see the reason code column on our annotated remittance
NCCI Policy Manual for Medicare Services, chapter 1, section V The rules below, revised each January

Not every code has an MUE, and CMS keeps some values confidential. Those are not in the published file and are applied only inside the contractor’s system.

MUE vs NCCI PTP edits

MUE PTP edit
Looks at One code and its units A pair of codes on the same day for the same patient
Question Is this many units plausible? Should these two codes be reported together?
Structure MUE value plus MAI Column one code paid, column two code denied, with a modifier indicator (0 never bypassed, 1 bypassed with an appropriate modifier, 9 not applicable)
Bypass Separate lines with a modifier, MAI 1 only Modifier 59 or XE, XP, XS, XU and others when the indicator is 1
Published Quarterly, cms.gov Quarterly, cms.gov, practitioner and hospital versions

MAI 1, 2 and 3

Before April 1, 2013, every MUE was applied line by line. Since then CMS has been converting codes to date of service edits, and the MAI in the table shows which kind applies to each code.

MAI Type How it is applied Can it be overridden?
1 Claim line edit Each claim line with the code is tested separately against the MUE value Yes. Report medically necessary units above the value on separate lines with an appropriate modifier (59 or XE, XP, XS, XU; 76; 77; 91; anatomic modifiers). Each line is adjudicated on its own
2 Date of service edit, policy Units on all lines for the code and date are summed; if the sum exceeds the value, all units for that code that day are denied No. The limit comes from statute, regulation or the code descriptor itself; contractors may not override it on processing, reopening or redetermination
3 Date of service edit, clinical Same summing as MAI 2 On appeal. If medical records show the units were performed, correctly coded and medically necessary, the contractor may bypass the edit on redetermination or a higher-level appeal

Two rules apply to all three. MUE denials may be appealed to the contractor, unlike timely filing denials. And because an MUE denial is a coding denial rather than a medical necessity denial, an Advance Beneficiary Notice does not shift liability: the patient cannot be billed for the denied units.

Radiation oncology values

From the practitioner table effective October 1, 2026:

Code Service MUE MAI
77300 Basic dosimetry calculation 10 3
77334 Treatment devices, complex 10 3
77332 Treatment devices, simple 4 3
77301 IMRT plan 1 3
77280 Simulation, simple 2 3
77387 Guidance for radiation treatment delivery 2 3
77427 Weekly treatment management 1 2
77336 Continuing medical physics consultation 1 2
77470 Special treatment procedure 1 2
96413 Chemotherapy infusion, first hour 1 3
96415 Chemotherapy infusion, each additional hour 8 3

Note the pattern. The codes whose descriptors already define the unit (77427 is per five fractions, 77336 is per five fractions, 77470 is per course) carry MAI 2: two units in one day is impossible by definition and no modifier or appeal will change it. The calculation and device codes carry MAI 3: ten on one day is unusual but not impossible, and an appeal with documentation can be paid.

A worked example

A complex multi-field plan requires 12 basic dosimetry calculations on the same day. The physicist’s worksheet supports all 12. The claim goes out with 77300 at 12 units on one line, 80.00 per unit, 960.00 billed (figures illustrative).

The MUE for 77300 is 10 with MAI 3, a date of service edit. The contractor sums the units for the date, finds 12, and denies all 12, not just the two over the limit: CO-151, N362, 960.00 denied, patient responsibility 0.00. Splitting the claim into a line of 10 and a line of 2 with modifier 76 would not help, because a date of service edit sums across lines before it compares. The remedy is a redetermination request with the plan documentation and the calculation worksheet; with MAI 3 the contractor may bypass the edit and pay all 12.

Contrast 77427. If a claim carries 2 units on one date, the MAI 2 edit denies both and there is nothing to appeal; the correction is to bill each unit on the date its five-fraction block ended.

What to do

  • Check units against the current table before you bill. The practitioner table changes quarterly; keep it loaded. The Iridium Suite claim scrubber compares the units on each line with the current MUE value before the claim is released, so a line over the limit is reviewed in the office rather than denied by the contractor.
  • For MAI 1 codes, report genuine units above the value on separate lines with the modifier that describes why (anatomic site, repeat procedure, distinct service) and keep the documentation.
  • For MAI 2 codes, treat the denial as a coding error. Re-read the descriptor, correct the units or the dates, and resubmit.
  • For MAI 3 codes, appeal with records when the units were real and necessary. If they were not, correct and resubmit.
  • Never bill the patient for MUE-denied units and do not issue an ABN for them.
  • Read the remittance. CARC 151 with N362 is the unit edit; CARC 97 (included in another service) with a different remark code is a PTP edit, which is handled differently.

Further reading: CMS: Medicare NCCI Medically Unlikely Edits; NCCI Policy Manual for Medicare Services 2026, chapter 1 (PDF); CMS: Medicare NCCI FAQ library; CMS: Medicare NCCI procedure-to-procedure edits.

Frequently asked

What is a medically unlikely edit?

An MUE is the maximum number of units of service that CMS expects for a HCPCS or CPT code, for one patient, from one provider, on one date of service, on the vast majority of correctly coded claims. Claims to Medicare contractors are tested against the MUE value, and a line or a day that exceeds it is denied.

What is the difference between an MUE and an NCCI PTP edit?

A procedure-to-procedure (PTP) edit looks at pairs of codes that should not be billed together on the same day. An MUE looks at one code and checks whether the number of units is plausible. Both are part of the National Correct Coding Initiative and both are updated quarterly.

What do MAI 1, 2 and 3 mean?

The MUE Adjudication Indicator tells you how the edit is applied. MAI 1 is a claim line edit: each line is tested separately, so correct units above the limit can be reported on separate lines with a modifier. MAI 2 is a date of service edit based on policy and cannot be overridden. MAI 3 is a date of service edit based on clinical data and can be paid on appeal with documentation.

Can I bill the patient for units denied by an MUE?

No. An MUE denial is a coding denial, not a medical necessity denial, so an Advance Beneficiary Notice does not shift liability and the patient cannot be billed for the denied units.